Jump to content
TJ09

2012-01-19 - Rule Clarification

Recommended Posts

Unless otherwise clarified, like for swearing, it shouldn't be linked or posted.

 

So linking to ancient Greek art is out of the question if it contains nudity. I and a few others find this a bit absurd. If I can't even post links to those images I'll live since I've never had to before, but just for clarification's sake...

Share this post


Link to post

This sounds like it ought to be, thank you ever so much.

I might even come back here more.

Share this post


Link to post

Wait, wait... I know I'm extremely thick, but... is this saying that we can link to youtube now, as long as we say beside the link that the comments or the video itself may/does contain swearing worse than what the forum allows...? huh.gif

 

Edit: Because before I just linked to youtuberepeat if one of the comments containing cursing, because I'm 99% sure I've heard somewhere that if there's cursing in the comments, ytrepeat should be linked to instead. In case that post was confusing.

 

As for everything else, thanks for the clarification. :3

Edited by TLOSpyrogirl

Share this post


Link to post

Great news. Thanks to all those who listened to and took user feedback into account, as well as a thanks to all those users who were a part of the discussions on the old-new-rules.

 

I too hope to see some more livelihood in GD once more, if anything it should be a lot more relaxed to post in. Progress! -jazzhands-

Share this post


Link to post
Wait, wait... I know I'm extremely thick, but... is this saying that we can link to youtube now, as long as we say beside the link that the comments or the video itself may/does contain swearing worse than what the forum allows...? huh.gif

 

Edit: Because before I just linked to youtuberepeat if one of the comments containing cursing, because I'm 99% sure I've heard somewhere that if there's cursing in the comments, ytrepeat should be linked to instead. In case that post was confusing.

 

As for everything else, thanks for the clarification. :3

Earlier during my 3+ years here, we were allowed to link to things that contain swearing, as long as there's a warning. If you read a warning and go to said link anyway, it's your fault if you get offended. /shrugs

Share this post


Link to post

So linking to ancient Greek art is out of the question if it contains nudity. I and a few others find this a bit absurd. If I can't even post links to those images I'll live since I've never had to before, but just for clarification's sake...

It is a bit absurd, yes. Would it be preferred that I err on the side of ambiguity ("linking to some nudity may be allowed in certain contexts that can't be exhaustively listed;" essentially YMMV) instead? Because I thought that was the opposite of the point of clarifying the rules.

Share this post


Link to post

It is a bit absurd, yes. Would it be preferred that I err on the side of ambiguity ("linking to some nudity may be allowed in certain contexts that can't be exhaustively listed;" essentially YMMV) instead? Because I thought that was the opposite of the point of clarifying the rules.

Yes please :3

 

Hey Wook!

Share this post


Link to post
Wait, wait... I know I'm extremely thick, but... is this saying that we can link to youtube now, as long as we say beside the link that the comments or the video itself may/does contain swearing worse than what the forum allows...? huh.gif

 

Edit: Because before I just linked to youtuberepeat if one of the comments containing cursing, because I'm 99% sure I've heard somewhere that if there's cursing in the comments, ytrepeat should be linked to instead. In case that post was confusing.

 

As for everything else, thanks for the clarification. :3

If you keep using youtuberepeat, then you won't have to worry about the comments at all!

 

Thanks for the clarification, TJ!

Share this post


Link to post

I guess I'll just keep using repeat, then. xd.png Either way, if repeat bugs anybody, all they have to do is just take the repeat out of the address bar and there's the real video. xP

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post

Okey dokey!

 

Quick question- what about the "gosh darn it to heck" variations? I know I use flandarized language occasionally, so it'd be nice to know just how carefully I need to watch that.

 

Oh, and the use of censorkip.gif if you feel the need? I don't do that one often, but just to be sure. xd.png

Share this post


Link to post

What about drug talk? And sex-ed?

 

Also, what gets a warning and what gets you banned?

 

Thank you for the clarifications!

Edited by stogucheme

Share this post


Link to post
It is a bit absurd, yes. Would it be preferred that I err on the side of ambiguity ("linking to some nudity may be allowed in certain contexts that can't be exhaustively listed;" essentially YMMV) instead? Because I thought that was the opposite of the point of clarifying the rules.

Dare I say yes? I don't think a situation like this has ever come up and you know the forums better than anyone else so anything you decide is fine with me. I don't know if anyone else is concerned about this issue (I may be the only one) but if you think there needs to be exceptions or if it's better to play it safe, I'm fine with it. I'd just like to know what I can and cant do on the forums in the future.

Share this post


Link to post

Dare I say yes? I don't think a situation like this has ever come up and you know the forums better than anyone else so anything you decide is fine with me. I don't know if anyone else is concerned about this issue (I may be the only one) but if you think there needs to be exceptions or if it's better to play it safe, I'm fine with it. I'd just like to know what I can and cant do on the forums in the future.

I'd have said that level of ambiguity was OK - and that anyone who finds a nudity link inappropriate should report it. If anyone reported a Botticelli nude link I would be very surprised....

 

stogucheme - I'd have said that the new guidelines were pretty clear -

Adult material (Nudity, pornography, or explicit sexual acts)

So sex ed as practised in schools would appear to be OK. Why anyone here would want to post anything more than that I don't know... unsure.gif

 

Drug talk -

Accounts of illegal activities

 

Covers that. "Accounts of activity" is not the same as pointing out that skunk can lead to paranoia.

 

Now this:

Viruses, spyware, or malware

I assume a thread like the recent one in Help where someone helped people to get RID of malware is OK ?

Edited by fuzzbucket

Share this post


Link to post

 

I assume a thread like the recent one in Help where someone helped people to get RID of malware is OK ?

I had the sense that this meant to linking to anything that could give you malware, viruses or spyware; I'm sure tips on how to remove or avoid it would be fine.

 

At least, that's my understanding.

Share this post


Link to post

You may find it great art, i might find it great art, but there are children that love dragon cave, surf these forums much faster than you or i, and are of an age that parents would be highly dismayed to find they went to such a link on a forum about breeding & raising cyber dragons.

Edited by Immorta

Share this post


Link to post
You may find it great art, i might find it great art, but there are children that love dragon cave, surf these forums much faster than you or i, and are of an age that parents would be highly dismayed to find they went to such a link on a forum about breeding & raising cyber dragons.

Then we better shut down all the museums for being non child friendly.

Share this post


Link to post
Then we better shut down all the museums for being non child friendly.

Children who are allowed here probably don't have quite such restrictive parents. My grandson(who plays the cave) is not - but that is NOT why !

 

Museums are supposed to encourage children to come in and look at art - in the UK at least...

Share this post


Link to post
Children who are allowed here probably don't have quite such restrictive parents. My grandson(who plays the cave) is not - but that is NOT why !

 

Museums are supposed to encourage children to come in and look at art - in the UK at least...

Was more of a joke than anything else but if forum content is supposed to be PG-13 and no child under that age without parent permission is supposed to be allowed, then I don't see how the "It's for the children" statements are valid.

Share this post


Link to post
You may find it great art, i might find it great art, but there are children that love dragon cave, surf these forums much faster than you or i, and are of an age that parents would be highly dismayed to find they went to such a link on a forum about breeding & raising cyber dragons.

I don't remember my mother screaming at the museum when, being 8, I saw several very famous and very splendid nudes in an exposition. Nor the mothers of all the other kids, nor was the school sued for perversion or anything of the sort.

 

Maybe I'm just too liberal, but considering some of the discussions I've read... really, it's just a human body. I have to agree with Wookie, it's ridiculous. It's not po... not even artistic po.... (I've seen it, DA is of late plagued by it). It's just a body, at least a link should be allowed with a warning, just in case Michelangelo's David offends anyone with his auream attributes.

Share this post


Link to post

I THINK what TJ was saying was just - do I have to spell out that artworks are OK but a life drawing from your class of someone who others might recognise probably isn't ?

Share this post


Link to post

This is probably a stupid question, too, and I'm sorry if this has already been answered. I have a lot to do, so I can't look through all of the posts. x3

 

We're not allowed to talk about viruses, spyware, or anything along those lines, but are can we still mention them in explaining our prolonged inactivity or something similar to that?

 

 

Also, I've never heard of youtuberepeat before. 0.0

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.