Posted November 23, 2011 No, it's wrong to add posts into the count that weren't intended to have numbers on them. While the first post has been lost some time ago, we don't have guidance on this, but I'm sure that the intent was not to count the number of posts that were tagged onto the thread. Rather, it was to have everyone add the number following the last good number above it. Anything else comes down to being spam, at least in the long run. Share this post Link to post
Posted November 23, 2011 I see. Didn't we already leave this behind? Well, since you aren't posting a number... 13,312. Share this post Link to post
Posted November 23, 2011 The last good number appears to be purplehaze's 13, 305. Why not just go back to there and continue with an accurate count? Just ignore the ones past that? Share this post Link to post
Posted November 23, 2011 The last good number appears to be purplehaze's 13, 305. Why not just go back to there and continue with an accurate count? Just ignore the ones past that? That was what I did back here! So we were fine. Now we are messed up again! Starting with my 13,305 and counting only the posts with numbers in them, we are now at: 13,314 Share this post Link to post
Recommended Posts